Moderator: Spider
nadrii wrote:- that logo hurts my eyes
All for now.
wowraider wrote:[*] Rankings for 10 and 25 men formats calculated separately, there is no united ladder, because there is no sense in it.
Shinafae wrote:wowraider wrote:[*] Rankings for 10 and 25 men formats calculated separately, there is no united ladder, because there is no sense in it.
I agree with this ; fights between the two raid sizes often have vastly different difficulties and directly comparing the two formats isn't very useful.
So, why is it that the first page in the PvE progress section appears to be a united ladder ?
Zoomkin wrote:Simply put, not matter what any users say, 10 man and 25 man are 2 different fights. The values of damage are different, hp values are different, mechanics are changed and different. No one under values their difficulty or puts that in question but, just because the boss has the same name, does not make it the same boss. It's like saying playing tennis on clay is just like playing on grass because it's tennis.
grunz wrote:Geez Dan, you use tennis as an example and whiff on the obvious analogy of singles vs doubles
Riggnaros wrote:You're missing the point.
Comparing 10 and 25 results is not doable. You cannot and will not come up with any algorithm or rule set that will change that.
They are as different as football and baseball. Just because they are both sports, doesnt mean you can compare the two. It's two different leagues and two different difficulties (not saying one is harder than the other). The logistics, planning, tuning, gearing, execution, mindset, positioning, class stacking, balance, the overall difficulty along with many other variables are all different and can not be compared.
You need two separate ranking systems. That's it. The more people try, the most its just making the situation worse.
Two different formats requires two different leaderboards.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests