Rogues rejoice, everyone else, COWER!

Forum for all Blood Legion friends to chat with us.

Moderator: Spider

Rogues rejoice, everyone else, COWER!

Postby Bine on Sat Apr 09, 2005 1:39 pm

Seems ambush and backstab never had the right multiplier before.

In this patch they fixed that, the result you ask? 3000 dmg, UNCRITICAL ambushes. GG mages, GG preists, GG warlocks.

Its over man, its over. I really have no idea how to cope with this. Mages might be able to frost nova and get away with 1 or 2k hp left, preists might get lucky and psychic scream, but jesus, warlocks got nothing for it...
User avatar
Bine
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:11 pm


Postby krk on Sat Apr 09, 2005 3:07 pm

So instead of nerfing sword/mace rogues, they buff dagger rogues?

Nice job tigole. He must really love his pet class.
krk
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 1:20 pm


Postby Puddy on Sat Apr 09, 2005 3:51 pm

ahh yes, another lieing post about rogues. whoever said 3000 damage uncritical ambush is completely lieing. someone who said that probably got pwned by a rogue and cried to the forums. you'll never see 3000 ambush.
i am Puddy
User avatar
Puddy
 
Posts: 924
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 7:30 pm


Postby Chimaira on Sat Apr 09, 2005 4:35 pm

its weapon damage+300% so ~1500 with a deathstriker

omg dagger rogues wtfpwn me/ cry
Illidan - 60 Undead Rogue
Chromaggus - 50 Orc Shaman
Anetheron - 60 Human Warrior
http://ctprofiles.net/1226201
User avatar
Chimaira
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:43 am
Location: Santa Cruz, CA


Postby Bine on Sat Apr 09, 2005 5:51 pm

It was actually a gloating rogue. I checked it out for myself and it looks like ambush can crit for around 2500 pretty easy, which is still insane.

And yeah, rogues do pwn me, still havent devised a way to do anything to them. Theres lots of nice juicy anti-CC items in that patch to, doesnt seem to be any way to compensate for all of this nerfage.
User avatar
Bine
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:11 pm


Postby Farvalicious on Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:26 pm

and thats why I said i wanted to get my rogue to 60 to do daggers u mofos
Image
User avatar
Farvalicious
 
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:22 pm
Location: Prairie Village, Kansas


Postby Spider on Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:51 pm

ive done 3.2k crits with ambush with a 36 dps dagger :P
AKA:
Spider
Sting
Lìta
Kerrìgan
Xallandria
User avatar
Spider
 
Posts: 2430
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 5:14 pm


Postby clownshoes on Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:52 pm

Sting wrote:ive done 3.2k crits with ambush with a 36 dps dagger :P



8==============================D

<3
User avatar
clownshoes
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:04 am


Postby Chimaira on Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:53 pm

dps doesnt matter...
Illidan - 60 Undead Rogue
Chromaggus - 50 Orc Shaman
Anetheron - 60 Human Warrior
http://ctprofiles.net/1226201
User avatar
Chimaira
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:43 am
Location: Santa Cruz, CA


Postby CookieMan on Sat Apr 09, 2005 11:26 pm

http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/threa ... ost2485852

hope they do nerf ambush back down again ><
<+Eusless> HIS TOE IS BIGGER THAN MY DICK
<@Lawliepop> i just couldn't not watch that
<+Eusless> I MEAN FINGER
User avatar
CookieMan
 
Posts: 1944
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 8:20 pm
Location: Ohio


Postby krk on Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:12 pm

I really wish I had picked a rogue, or another pet dev class. Remember invisibility? And the outcry b/c mages
could farm instances easily? What was the outcome? A knee-jerk reaction of removing the spell.

Fast-forward 6 months to the stealth + SM issue. What was the outcome of that? NOT a knee-jerk reaction of nerfing stealth but actually nerfing the vendor value of the items.

Thanks Tigole. Rogues, you're in 'good' hands.
krk
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 1:20 pm


Postby Bubba on Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:31 pm

The issue with invisibility was not the farming of SM, it was the fact that it was way too powerful in pvp.
One day I'm gonna pwn all of you nub nuts.
Bubba
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 8:20 pm


Postby CookieMan on Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:41 pm

Bubba wrote:The issue with invisibility was not the farming of SM, it was the fact that it was way too powerful in pvp.


yup...invis pyro was sooooo goddamn annoying/overpowered ><
<+Eusless> HIS TOE IS BIGGER THAN MY DICK
<@Lawliepop> i just couldn't not watch that
<+Eusless> I MEAN FINGER
User avatar
CookieMan
 
Posts: 1944
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 8:20 pm
Location: Ohio


Postby newworldempire on Sun Apr 10, 2005 1:14 pm

I've always felt that the invis change was because Mages were becomeing a ranged magic based rogue and it didn't fit their primary role of support dps and CC.
Nargall, Destroyer of Spam Posts, Master of Lore.
User avatar
newworldempire
 
Posts: 1162
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 12:29 pm
Location: Guelph ON


Postby verbim on Sun Apr 10, 2005 1:17 pm

yea, and pyro did about twice the upfront damamge, with no over-time component. coupled with combustion, mages would easily one-shot most classes. you'd be out killing mobs, and every 15 minutes or so you'd just randomly drop dead. no chance to see the mage coming, or casting, or anything.

...and of course, mages argued that it was balanced, because you could buy piles of fire protection pots and keep the damage shield up at ALL times. :roll:
...Nine Hundred Newtons//Crush You Like Croutons...
User avatar
verbim
 
Posts: 1059
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: Boulder, CO


Next

Return to Public for Peasants

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests